Wednesday, September 11, 2013 12:03 AM
Unique Device Identification System Overview and What it Means for Medical Device Manufacturers
Most medical device manufacturers today use proprietary identifiers for their products, so compliance with FDA’s UDI requirements force them to invest heavily in a multitude of changes – from data used in both internal systems and external transactions, to the physical packaging and labeling of their devices.
By Mohan Ponnudurai, Sparta Systems
As part of the mandate to improve public safety, US Food and Drug Administration submits many regulatory rules. Successful companies put themselves in a leading position to react swiftly them, and become compliant. In June 2013, the FDA submitted its Final Rule for Unique Device Identification (UDI) to the Office of Management and Budget (OBM) for review. This is one of the last steps before publication of the rule.
- Manufacturers of Class I, II and III medical devices will be required to assign unique identifiers to their products.
- The UDIs will be required on all levels of packaging down to the lowest unit of use in both human and machine readable formats. This also includes direct part marking for certain devices.
- Medical device manufacturers will also be required to submit data on their products to a global UDI database (GUDID) that will be available to the public and health care providers.
UDI requirements focus on making operational changes that improve patient safety, traceability and operations. Medical devices deemed critical are subject to this mandate, starting with the most critical (Class III) and ending with least critical (Class I) devices.
UDI implementation timeline
Importance and challenge of UDI compliance
The UDI rule requires the most critical medical devices to uniquely identify and improve recall management and traceability, patient safety through effective adverse event identification (facilitate effective global reporting information), and device authentication (close the counterfeit in the supply chain). While the establishment of a UDI system will enable the healthcare industry to improve patient safety by facilitating more accurate adverse event reporting and recall management, the work of device enumeration and GUDID population is no simple task. Because most medical device manufacturers today use proprietary identifiers for their products, compliance with the FDA’s UDI requirements force them to invest heavily in a multitude of changes – from data used in both internal systems and external transactions, to the physical packaging and labeling of their devices. Furthermore, FDA’s decision to make the GUDID available to the public shows its commitment to protect end-users.
Medical device supply chain before and after UDI
Some of the most critical medical devices have a complex web of sub-contractors, outsourced manufacturers, levels of distribution channel and finally health care providers leading to the final patient. There are many systems that are disparate, unique and disconnected that track these stages, however, they are not correlated. This leads to the issue of knowing where the final product is should there be a recall related to product quality, performance deficiency or adverse event.
With the new mandate, every stage of the product manufacturing evolution will use the same UDI making it quicker and more effective to track any device through the supply chain. When UDI is fully implemented, product recall management will significantly increase allowing unsafe or ineffective devices to be repaired, removed or corrected in a timely fashion.
About the Author:
is an Industry Solution Director in Sparta Systems
’ Product Management group, responsible for helping guide the company’s alignment with industry trends, needs and requirements. Additionally, he helps both our company and our clients in the Oil and Gas (Energy and Services) and Food and Beverages sectors track and understand changes in the regulatory and business environment. Mohan earned his Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering from McGill University (Montreal, Canada) and MBA from the University of Tampa, FL.